Sorry beavs, but this game was straight embarrasing. When the hightlight play is a fieldgoal in the first half, you've got a sad situation on your hands. You got owned by the University of Oregon and respond by failing to score a single touchdown. Another embarrasment for Corvallis.
What a barn burner of a game. That should go wonders for recruiting. Especially after getting throttled by Oregon last month.
ReplyDeleteSorry beavs, but this game was straight embarrasing. When the hightlight play is a fieldgoal in the first half, you've got a sad situation on your hands. You got owned by the University of Oregon and respond by failing to score a single touchdown. Another embarrasment for Corvallis.
ReplyDeleteA win is a win. 5-0 in bowls under Riley. Enough said.
ReplyDelete10 years from now, nobody will care the details of this game.
Do you think Pitt players would have taken a 3-0 win? Yes, they would.
I guarantee you that nobody predicted that the Beavers would finish 9-4.
If you are a Duck fan, I could care less. Oregon wishes it had OSU's swagger.
3-0 is ugly, but no James and no Quizz. A win is a win and I'll take 5-0 in bowl games over 4-1 any day.
ReplyDeleteThat's 10-4, 9-4, and 9-4 over the last 3 seasons. A program.
People are still talking about the 3-0 USC win from 1967. A win is a win.
Here's an interesting note. The Beavs are 8-4 in bowl games all time. The Ducks? 8-13. Same number of bowl wins. Half the attempts. Interesting, eh?
Jason,
ReplyDeleteIt's the quality of the bowl wins that count. UW vs. WSU this year was more interesting.
That poor game was beaten with an ugly stick on national tv. beavernation rocks!
There is no question it was an ugly win.
ReplyDeleteThe offense did not deliver in the Red Zone. The score should have been 20-0, not 3-0.
OSU's defense played a great game, which they needed to do after the embarrassment in the Civil War.